it is by MillMan (2.00 / 0) #10 Tue May 13, 2008 at 02:09:38 AM EST
just a symbol of Clinton's desperation. Her campaign is running on fumes.

That ad is race baiting, sure, but nationally Obama has had to kiss a lot of white ass, especially in the wake of "pastor gate." With most of the country being white and the default voting style being "from the gut" he doesn't have much choice.

When I'm imprisoned as an enemy combatant, will you blog about it?
[ Parent ]

I agree that Clinton's running on fumes. by Billy Goat (2.00 / 0) #12 Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:38:01 AM EST
Her persistence is bizarre. I've heard no good theories to explain her continued efforts.

I disagree, though, that this is new phase for Obama. He was promising Dems to bring in the black vote as early as January of this year, well before having explain the irrelevant rantings of Wright to the scandal hungry media.

I'm just trying to point to what I feel is a double standard. When Clinton calls a group of female voters the backbone of her campaign (and they are, women have strongly supported her campaign throughout), she's playing slimy identity politics. When Obama overtly appeals to the race of black voters, he's "got no choice."

I don't see the difference.

[ Parent ]

double standards by MillMan (2.00 / 0) #17 Tue May 13, 2008 at 01:42:23 PM EST
I think Hilary has had a slightly easier go-round with the media during this campaign. But not by much. I won't offer evidence though. They've both been slapped around a lot.

When I'm imprisoned as an enemy combatant, will you blog about it?
[ Parent ]

I saw some data from the Pew Center . . . by Billy Goat (2.00 / 0) #18 Tue May 13, 2008 at 02:46:19 PM EST
Clinton got more coverage in total, but a slightly higher percentage of the coverage was negative. But we're talking just a couple of percentage points of difference.

Curiously, when asked during the same period, Americans of both political persuasions thought they noticed Obama got overwhelmingly more press, a vast majority of it positive. I don't know what to make of that. Suggests an interesting split between what the media coverage & spin and the public opinion it supposedly shapes.

[ Parent ]

People tend to notice things that are new by lm (2.00 / 0) #19 Wed May 14, 2008 at 05:14:21 PM EST
Obama is newer to the political scene, hence people notice him more than they do Clinton whose been in the national news in one form or another for 16+ years.

There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

Login
Make a new account
Username:
Password: